Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: Bus roof torn off on impact under railway bridge incidents - merged topics In "Buses and other ways to travel" [375134/6748/5] Posted by ChrisB at 21:43, 14th May 2026 | ![]() |
That wasn't one of their brand new electric buses?
| Re: Reopening former rail line between Hythe and Totton - ongoing discussion, merged topic In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [375133/10308/28] Posted by ChrisB at 21:26, 14th May 2026 | ![]() |
EWR services are likely to eventually go south towards Reading/Swindon but would require UP island platforms
| Re: TfW proposed services into Bristol In "Bristol and Bath (WECA, now WEMCA)" [375132/32031/21] Posted by Mark A at 20:59, 14th May 2026 | ![]() |
I wonder if GWR might have been more agreeable if the Welsh Assembly pushed for and contributed to electrification of Filton Bank into Temple Meads?
I think you are a little optimistic about the prospect for traffic for Bristol beyond Gt Malvern **snip**
I think you are a little optimistic about the prospect for traffic for Bristol beyond Gt Malvern **snip**
Ah, I was thinking Bristol - Hereford - Shrewsbury - Chester via the Maindee curve before Newport. Not a great distance. Suboptimal road connections. Hopefully the Maindee curve being singled hasn't screwed its capacity too much - before it was singled, didn't some Regional Railways services provide just that?
Mark
| Re: Scottish Borders Railway - rebuilt Waverley Route link to Edinburgh In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [375131/5604/51] Posted by ChrisB at 20:41, 14th May 2026 | ![]() |
I suspect that Scottish electrification is the money the Barnett formula gave them for HS2 spend
| New Bradford-on-Avon bridge will 'solve decades-long problem' in Wiltshire In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [375130/32033/31] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 20:32, 14th May 2026 | ![]() |
From the BBC:
New bridge will 'solve decades-long problem'

Residents have told the BBC they have been "scraped by lorries" and "whacked by wing mirrors" using Town Bridge - Image © Bradford-on-Avon Town Council
A new bridge, costing about £440,000, will make a town centre "safer for pedestrians and cyclists and solve a "decades-long problem", council chiefs say.
Under the plans, a footbridge will be built in the centre of Bradford-on-Avon to offer an alternative route to Town Bridge, where pedestrians have reported being scraped by lorries and hit by wing mirrors.
Wiltshire Council has now secured about £50,000 for the bridge's design and business case.
The town's mayor Jack Vittles said the new route could solve a "decades-long problem", adding if you are using a pushchair or using a wheelchair, the current bridge is "borderline unusable".
Councillor Martin Smith, cabinet member for highways, said: "We know that crossing the river can be particularly challenging at busy times, and concerns have been raised locally about pedestrian safety on the Town Bridge, especially for those walking close to traffic. A new pedestrian and cycling bridge would provide a much safer alternative route, helping people to avoid traffic, encouraging more active travel and improving everyday journeys around the town," he added.
Wiltshire Council said the bridge will connect Bridge Street on the south side to Bridge Yard on the north.
A draft four-year plan has been submitted by the council to Active Travel England (ATE), which includes allocating more than £440,000 for the bridge until 2030. The initial £50,000, which has been approved by ATE, could mean the design is submitted within the next year.
Vittles said the current bridge "puts people off" going into the town centre. "We've consulted on this for a number of years...and there's a real need and a desire for this," he added.

Residents have told the BBC they have been "scraped by lorries" and "whacked by wing mirrors" using Town Bridge - Image © Bradford-on-Avon Town Council
A new bridge, costing about £440,000, will make a town centre "safer for pedestrians and cyclists and solve a "decades-long problem", council chiefs say.
Under the plans, a footbridge will be built in the centre of Bradford-on-Avon to offer an alternative route to Town Bridge, where pedestrians have reported being scraped by lorries and hit by wing mirrors.
Wiltshire Council has now secured about £50,000 for the bridge's design and business case.
The town's mayor Jack Vittles said the new route could solve a "decades-long problem", adding if you are using a pushchair or using a wheelchair, the current bridge is "borderline unusable".
Councillor Martin Smith, cabinet member for highways, said: "We know that crossing the river can be particularly challenging at busy times, and concerns have been raised locally about pedestrian safety on the Town Bridge, especially for those walking close to traffic. A new pedestrian and cycling bridge would provide a much safer alternative route, helping people to avoid traffic, encouraging more active travel and improving everyday journeys around the town," he added.
Wiltshire Council said the bridge will connect Bridge Street on the south side to Bridge Yard on the north.
A draft four-year plan has been submitted by the council to Active Travel England (ATE), which includes allocating more than £440,000 for the bridge until 2030. The initial £50,000, which has been approved by ATE, could mean the design is submitted within the next year.
Vittles said the current bridge "puts people off" going into the town centre. "We've consulted on this for a number of years...and there's a real need and a desire for this," he added.
| Re: Scottish Borders Railway - rebuilt Waverley Route link to Edinburgh In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [375129/5604/51] Posted by ray951 at 20:07, 14th May 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
It has just struck me. "They" (Treasury who control everything, including bankrolling the Scottish government's deficit) can allow expenditure to electrify the rail connections from Edinburgh to Galashiels (pop. 10,060) and Tweedbank (pop. 2,101), but not the rail connections from Exeter (pop.138,399) Plymouth (277,695), Gloucester (pop. 132,416), Cheltenham (pop. 118,836), Oxford (pop. 166,034, nearest connection just 10 miles away), Worcester (pop.103,872) to the national network, never mind that small station at Temple Meads.
Tell me again about how all the money stays in the south.....
Wait till you see the price of tickets in the South compared to the North. Tell me again about how all the money stays in the south.....
Check how many tram/light rail services there are south of Birmingham compared to north of Birmingham.
And while I am on a roll, guess which part of England currently has its main lines being electrified?
And Scotland does get more govt funding per head than England.
| Re: Reopening former rail line between Hythe and Totton - ongoing discussion, merged topic In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [375128/10308/28] Posted by ChrisB at 20:00, 14th May 2026 | ![]() |
Chiltern's Oxford services are currently slated to do that, with another 2tph eventually shuttling between Hanborough & Cowley.
In terms of road crossings, on the GWML there's the terrible twosome at Steventon, and on the line to Oxford there's an 'Authorised user only one with a not-particularly-helpful road arrangement at either side - recorded on a Google Streetview from 2011 with a sort of vehicular dance in progress and which can't fill anyone that sees the image with much reassurance. c. 2016 it received a pair of gantries at either side but I don't know what those were for. (Streetview link below shows the most recent image...)
Mark
https://maps.app.goo.gl/qna9Cq2HHiaDtV9E8
The gantries are part of the aborted electrification scheme to Oxford, cancelled 10 years and no sign of it ever being finished.Mark
https://maps.app.goo.gl/qna9Cq2HHiaDtV9E8
| Re: Kernow Connect - a new Okehampton to Bodmin line In "Campaigns for new and improved services" [375126/32014/28] Posted by Noggin at 19:55, 14th May 2026 Already liked by trainbuff, Andy E | ![]() |
If you take a look at a map (let alone at the topography), it becomes clear that it would be very complicated indeed to run a railway next to the A30, particularly through places like Launceston where there isn't a clear land corridor.
The more you look, the more it seems like reopening Okehampton to Tavistock (including refurbishment of the Meldon Viaduct) might actually be a reasonably-priced idea in comparison, and electrification from Newbury to Exeter could be positively low-hanging fruit!
| Re: Night Riviera Sleeper train - between Paddington and Penzance - ongoing discussion In "London to the West" [375125/31911/12] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 19:54, 14th May 2026 | ![]() |
Thanks, bobm. I was forming a suitable update post myself.
Member 'martyjon' was a frequent, and well-informed, contributor on the Coffee Shop forum.
| Re: C2C Nationalised - 20th July 2025 In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [375124/30469/51] Posted by eightonedee at 19:46, 14th May 2026 | ![]() |
What will stop is tax payers money paying the bubbly and canopies at the share holders meeting Grin
..the cost of which (if it happens) would be a tiny fraction of the cost of the re-branding that will now be rolled out, or the costs to society of the first national rail strike triggered by a dispute in an area remote from the former C2C patch...
The Cowley branch is set to reopen as a result of the multi-billion-pound EIT facility being developed at Oxford Science Park. The project is expected to create up to 7,000 jobs, and EIT has also helped fund the reopening.
Interestingly, the push for the scheme came from the Treasury rather than the Department for Transport. The DfT had previously stated that there was no further funding available for rail improvements, so the announcement of the reopening came as a surprise to many industry observers. I suspect there was a conversation between Ellison and the Government regarding transport links to Oxford Science Park, given the scale of the investment being made there and whether those investments would continue.
But I agree that the line to Marchwood line should be an ideal candidate to reopen given the housing growth in that area and the difficult of traveling by car/bus to Southampton.
Interestingly, the push for the scheme came from the Treasury rather than the Department for Transport. The DfT had previously stated that there was no further funding available for rail improvements, so the announcement of the reopening came as a surprise to many industry observers. I suspect there was a conversation between Ellison and the Government regarding transport links to Oxford Science Park, given the scale of the investment being made there and whether those investments would continue.
But I agree that the line to Marchwood line should be an ideal candidate to reopen given the housing growth in that area and the difficult of traveling by car/bus to Southampton.
Doesn't this also help capacity issues at Oxford Station as EWR services (when they finally run) can terminate at Cowley
| Re: TfW proposed services into Bristol In "Bristol and Bath (WECA, now WEMCA)" [375122/32031/21] Posted by Noggin at 19:41, 14th May 2026 | ![]() |
I wonder if GWR might have been more agreeable if the Welsh Assembly pushed for and contributed to electrification of Filton Bank into Temple Meads?
I think you are a little optimistic about the prospect for traffic for Bristol beyond Gt Malvern, but is there perhaps an argument that Cheltenham Spa to Newport should be run by GWR rather than TfW as it runs Gloucestershire for the majority of it's length?
In fact, if Gloucestershire were to join WECA, might there be a business case for reopening the line through the city and extending Newport services to a new Cheltenham North Parkway station and the racecourse as some kind of "Gloucestershire Metro"?
It has just struck me. "They" (Treasury who control everything, including bankrolling the Scottish government's deficit) can allow expenditure to electrify the rail connections from Edinburgh to Galashiels (pop. 10,060) and Tweedbank (pop. 2,101), but not the rail connections from Exeter (pop.138,399) Plymouth (277,695), Gloucester (pop. 132,416), Cheltenham (pop. 118,836), Oxford (pop. 166,034, nearest connection just 10 miles away), Worcester (pop.103,872) to the national network, never mind that small station at Temple Meads.
Tell me again about how all the money stays in the south.....
| Re: Night Riviera Sleeper train - between Paddington and Penzance - ongoing discussion In "London to the West" [375120/31911/12] Posted by bobm at 19:27, 14th May 2026 | ![]() |
Sadly we will never know what martyjon meant. He died two years after that post in 2020.
https://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=24134.msg295672#msg295672
| Bristol Airport Megabus experience left disabled woman 'in tears' In "Buses and other ways to travel" [375119/32032/5] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 19:14, 14th May 2026 | ![]() |
From the BBC:
Disabled woman 'forced' to use stairs on Megabus

The megabus service at Bristol Airport has one row of accessible seats behind the driver
A woman with mobility issues said she was told she had to climb up the stairs on a bus because the driver did not want anyone to sit near him.
Jenny Rowe, 77, was getting a Megabus coach from Bristol Airport to Wellington, Somerset, after a cruise holiday. She has mobility issues, including problems with her spine, and has had a hip operation.
The coaches have a single row of seats behind the driver, with all other seats up a flight of stairs. Rowe said the driver told her to sit upstairs or "get off", which was an "awful" experience that ruined her holiday.
The company has apologised and said it would refund her ticket.
Rowe struggles to walk, which led to airport staff taking her by wheelchair from the terminal right to the bus stop. "I paid for my ticket and as I went to get on the bus I said: 'Can I get on to the seats behind the driver?' He said: 'No, I don't have anybody talking to me, I'm not having it. You either go up those stairs or you get off'. I can't do stairs. It's so painful to do stairs. I got to the top, absolutely in tears."
Rowe, from Wellington in Somerset, added: "Everybody on the bus was looking at me, I felt like I was two inches high."
Jet Gates, a disability campaigner said Rowe's story is "heartbreaking". "We see it so much - disabled people being in situations where they feel humiliated and treated like a piece of luggage," Gates added. She said the situation was "completely unacceptable" and there was a reason the seats exist on the bus. "It puts her in a situation where she's severely vulnerable," Gates said. "It's 2026, we need to stop treating disabled people like this, we are humans. That is the main element to take away from this. There is more empathy to be had."
A spokesperson for Megabus Falcon, which runs the Plymouth-bound service, said: "We are very sorry for the level of service this customer received during her journey. It's clear that the service she received on this occasion did not meet our usual standards. We are addressing the issue privately with the driver involved as well as reinforcing among all employees our high expectations around customer service and, in particular, supporting customers with additional mobility requirements."

The megabus service at Bristol Airport has one row of accessible seats behind the driver
A woman with mobility issues said she was told she had to climb up the stairs on a bus because the driver did not want anyone to sit near him.
Jenny Rowe, 77, was getting a Megabus coach from Bristol Airport to Wellington, Somerset, after a cruise holiday. She has mobility issues, including problems with her spine, and has had a hip operation.
The coaches have a single row of seats behind the driver, with all other seats up a flight of stairs. Rowe said the driver told her to sit upstairs or "get off", which was an "awful" experience that ruined her holiday.
The company has apologised and said it would refund her ticket.
Rowe struggles to walk, which led to airport staff taking her by wheelchair from the terminal right to the bus stop. "I paid for my ticket and as I went to get on the bus I said: 'Can I get on to the seats behind the driver?' He said: 'No, I don't have anybody talking to me, I'm not having it. You either go up those stairs or you get off'. I can't do stairs. It's so painful to do stairs. I got to the top, absolutely in tears."
Rowe, from Wellington in Somerset, added: "Everybody on the bus was looking at me, I felt like I was two inches high."
Jet Gates, a disability campaigner said Rowe's story is "heartbreaking". "We see it so much - disabled people being in situations where they feel humiliated and treated like a piece of luggage," Gates added. She said the situation was "completely unacceptable" and there was a reason the seats exist on the bus. "It puts her in a situation where she's severely vulnerable," Gates said. "It's 2026, we need to stop treating disabled people like this, we are humans. That is the main element to take away from this. There is more empathy to be had."
A spokesperson for Megabus Falcon, which runs the Plymouth-bound service, said: "We are very sorry for the level of service this customer received during her journey. It's clear that the service she received on this occasion did not meet our usual standards. We are addressing the issue privately with the driver involved as well as reinforcing among all employees our high expectations around customer service and, in particular, supporting customers with additional mobility requirements."
It’s the UWC (User Worked Crossings), that are the issue, not road crossings.
| Re: RAF Spitfire aircraft - original and replica - various incidents In "The West - but NOT trains in the West" [375117/30240/31] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 18:31, 14th May 2026 | ![]() |
From the BBC:
Spitfire crash death was accident, Oxfordshire coroner rules

The Spitfire was attempting to take off from Enstone Airfield near Chipping Norton - Image © AAIB
A former commercial pilot died after losing control of a replica Spitfire during takeoff, an inquest has found.
Peter Hughes, 71, died when the plane crashed and caught fire at Enstone Airfield near Chipping Norton in Oxfordshire on 28 July 2024.
At an inquest earlier this week, a jury inquest at Oxford Coroner's Court ruled Hughes' death had been an accident caused by the ensuing fire. The hearing found that the plane had crashed after losing control soon after it had taken off, with the reason for this not being ascertained.
Hughes had been the only passenger in the model Spitfire, and no one else was injured in the incident.
The replica of the Second World War fighter plane had been built in 2013.
An investigation by the Air Accident Investigation Branch (AAIB) concluded last year that the plane had pivoted to the left during takeoff, before flipping over and crashing. It found no technical defects which would have affected the controllability of the aircraft.
The AAIB report said CCTV and witness reports showed the aircraft "pitched up sharply and then rolled rapidly to the left" towards the edge of the runway. The left wingtip struck the the ground and the plane flipped over and caught fire, fatally injuring Hughes. The report said "no definitive cause" was established for the loss of control.
In a statement released after his crash, Hughes' family said they were "devastated" by his death. "Pete was an extremely good man who was deeply generous in so many ways; his love, his time, energy and spirit, and was an integral part of the numerous communities that he held dear," the family added.
The crash was the second involving a replica Spitfire from the airfield within 10 months. In 2023 Trevor Bailey, 68, from Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, died flying a replica Spitfire near Enstone.

The Spitfire was attempting to take off from Enstone Airfield near Chipping Norton - Image © AAIB
A former commercial pilot died after losing control of a replica Spitfire during takeoff, an inquest has found.
Peter Hughes, 71, died when the plane crashed and caught fire at Enstone Airfield near Chipping Norton in Oxfordshire on 28 July 2024.
At an inquest earlier this week, a jury inquest at Oxford Coroner's Court ruled Hughes' death had been an accident caused by the ensuing fire. The hearing found that the plane had crashed after losing control soon after it had taken off, with the reason for this not being ascertained.
Hughes had been the only passenger in the model Spitfire, and no one else was injured in the incident.
The replica of the Second World War fighter plane had been built in 2013.
An investigation by the Air Accident Investigation Branch (AAIB) concluded last year that the plane had pivoted to the left during takeoff, before flipping over and crashing. It found no technical defects which would have affected the controllability of the aircraft.
The AAIB report said CCTV and witness reports showed the aircraft "pitched up sharply and then rolled rapidly to the left" towards the edge of the runway. The left wingtip struck the the ground and the plane flipped over and caught fire, fatally injuring Hughes. The report said "no definitive cause" was established for the loss of control.
In a statement released after his crash, Hughes' family said they were "devastated" by his death. "Pete was an extremely good man who was deeply generous in so many ways; his love, his time, energy and spirit, and was an integral part of the numerous communities that he held dear," the family added.
The crash was the second involving a replica Spitfire from the airfield within 10 months. In 2023 Trevor Bailey, 68, from Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, died flying a replica Spitfire near Enstone.
| Re: Bristol Temple Meads - station, facilities, incidents and events (merged posts) In "Bristol and Bath (WECA, now WEMCA)" [375116/10737/21] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 17:31, 14th May 2026 | ![]() |
Who designed a round room with two great pillars in the middle of the presentation area
An architect with brutalist tendencies.

| Re: C2C Nationalised - 20th July 2025 In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [375115/30469/51] Posted by Electric train at 16:07, 14th May 2026 | ![]() |
Alexander also clarified on the BBC that nationalisation won't bring lower fares, given the amount of taxpayer subsidy still being ploughed into the railways.
What will stop is tax payers money paying the bubbly and canopies at the share holders meeting

| Re: Manvers Street, Bath, disrupted for reconstruction works for 6 months from May. In "Buses and other ways to travel" [375114/31887/5] Posted by Mark A at 15:13, 14th May 2026 | ![]() |
More on the city's buses May - November from First Bus now: with the Manvers Street closure there will be far less provision across the city centre, also, will some locations used as temporary terminuses possibly be standing room only, but for buses? Also to be factored in: buses routed via several of the city's traffic pinch points.
https://www.firstbus.co.uk/bristol-bath-and-west/news-and-service-updates/updates/manvers-street-bridge-street-bath-road
I can't find anything on Stagecoach's site about the closure yet. Ditto the big lemon. A couple of weeks ago I dropped CT coaches an email to ask about their plans for this but no response yet. (CT coaches run a minibus or two covering several local authority supported routes).
Mark
| Re: Motability - merged posts, ongoing developments and discussion In "Buses and other ways to travel" [375113/21006/5] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 14:25, 14th May 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
From the BBC:
Motability withdraws compulsory black boxes after criticism from drivers
Motability drivers will no longer need to have a black box fitted to their vehicles following criticism from users affected by the rule changes.
The Motability scheme - where certain disability benefits can be exchanged for a lease on a vehicle - had made the black boxes compulsory for new leaseholders, and all drivers aged under 30, in April.
Motability boss Andrew Miller said the "Drive Smart" programme was introduced to help reduce accidents and manage insurance costs, but had been paused amid concerns and "anxiety" from users. He said drivers reported the app was inconsistent, did not understand their driving adaptations and that the rules and guidelines were confusing and restrictive.
The black boxes were designed to track and regularly rate a user's driving habits, such as speed and braking, where repeated poor ratings could have seen drivers removed from the Motability scheme altogether.
Now those who were enrolled with the Drive Smart programme will be taken off it from 22 May, Motability said.
The changes had been criticised by actor and disability rights campaigner Keron Day, who thanked Motability bosses for "recognising the seriousness of the issues for disabled people's lives."
Day, who appeared in the hit Netflix show Sex Education, has cerebral palsy and uses a specially adapted wheelchair accessible vehicle (WAV). The car has a steering aid and indicators on the floor, as well as buttons for lights, wipers, gears and the handbrake.
He campaigned alongside West Cornwall MP Andrew George to reverse the decision for compulsory black boxes. The pair met Motability bosses to discuss the issue last week.
Motability CEO Andrew Miller said: "Drive Smart was introduced to help reduce accidents, improve driving and, in turn, manage insurance costs, while keeping all the scheme's insurance features in place. But we have listened carefully to customer feedback and recognise that the experience was not where it needed to be. That is why we have decided to pause Drive Smart while we work with customers to understand how it can be improved."
Black boxes monitor driving habits and can provide a weekly rating graded using a traffic light colour scheme. A green rating could mean cheaper insurance, but more than four red ratings over a period of 12 months could see drivers removed from the Motability scheme.
George and Day had criticised Motability for imposing an "invasive telematics tracking technology" without proper consultation or adequate safeguards in place. George said: "I must congratulate Motability CEOs for listening and being prepared to change policy when confronted with the impact this scheme has had on thousands of disabled people. Keron and I are keen that they make some major changes before deciding how they will better manage the difficult insurance challenges faced by the scheme."
Motability said it would continue to review the programme and was also creating a new customer panel to allow users to help shape how Drive Smart develops.
Motability drivers will no longer need to have a black box fitted to their vehicles following criticism from users affected by the rule changes.
The Motability scheme - where certain disability benefits can be exchanged for a lease on a vehicle - had made the black boxes compulsory for new leaseholders, and all drivers aged under 30, in April.
Motability boss Andrew Miller said the "Drive Smart" programme was introduced to help reduce accidents and manage insurance costs, but had been paused amid concerns and "anxiety" from users. He said drivers reported the app was inconsistent, did not understand their driving adaptations and that the rules and guidelines were confusing and restrictive.
The black boxes were designed to track and regularly rate a user's driving habits, such as speed and braking, where repeated poor ratings could have seen drivers removed from the Motability scheme altogether.
Now those who were enrolled with the Drive Smart programme will be taken off it from 22 May, Motability said.
The changes had been criticised by actor and disability rights campaigner Keron Day, who thanked Motability bosses for "recognising the seriousness of the issues for disabled people's lives."
Day, who appeared in the hit Netflix show Sex Education, has cerebral palsy and uses a specially adapted wheelchair accessible vehicle (WAV). The car has a steering aid and indicators on the floor, as well as buttons for lights, wipers, gears and the handbrake.
He campaigned alongside West Cornwall MP Andrew George to reverse the decision for compulsory black boxes. The pair met Motability bosses to discuss the issue last week.
Motability CEO Andrew Miller said: "Drive Smart was introduced to help reduce accidents, improve driving and, in turn, manage insurance costs, while keeping all the scheme's insurance features in place. But we have listened carefully to customer feedback and recognise that the experience was not where it needed to be. That is why we have decided to pause Drive Smart while we work with customers to understand how it can be improved."
Black boxes monitor driving habits and can provide a weekly rating graded using a traffic light colour scheme. A green rating could mean cheaper insurance, but more than four red ratings over a period of 12 months could see drivers removed from the Motability scheme.
George and Day had criticised Motability for imposing an "invasive telematics tracking technology" without proper consultation or adequate safeguards in place. George said: "I must congratulate Motability CEOs for listening and being prepared to change policy when confronted with the impact this scheme has had on thousands of disabled people. Keron and I are keen that they make some major changes before deciding how they will better manage the difficult insurance challenges faced by the scheme."
Motability said it would continue to review the programme and was also creating a new customer panel to allow users to help shape how Drive Smart develops.
| Re: Bristol Temple Meads - station, facilities, incidents and events (merged posts) In "Bristol and Bath (WECA, now WEMCA)" [375112/10737/21] Posted by Phantom at 14:03, 14th May 2026 | ![]() |
Who designed a round room with two great pillars in the middle of the presentation area
| Re: New Oxford - Bristol direct service, ongoing developments and discussion In "Oxford, Didcot and Reading from the West" [375111/28355/22] Posted by Mark A at 13:52, 14th May 2026 | ![]() |
In terms of road crossings, on the GWML there's the terrible twosome at Steventon, and on the line to Oxford there's an 'Authorised user only one with a not-particularly-helpful road arrangement at either side - recorded on a Google Streetview from 2011 with a sort of vehicular dance in progress and which can't fill anyone that sees the image with much reassurance. c. 2016 it received a pair of gantries at either side but I don't know what those were for. (Streetview link below shows the most recent image...)
Mark
https://maps.app.goo.gl/qna9Cq2HHiaDtV9E8
Is it me or does this conflate two separate issues?
Indeed, I don't recall any level crossings on the Didcot west curve ...
| Re: Scottish Borders Railway - rebuilt Waverley Route link to Edinburgh In "The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom" [375109/5604/51] Posted by Mark A at 11:40, 14th May 2026 | ![]() |
Electrification works on the Borders Railway across the viaduct crossing the Tweed requiring a slight tweak to late evening weekday train services.
Mark
https://www.hellorayo.co.uk/greatest-hits/borders/news/borders-railway-electrification-services-temporarily-withdrawn
| Re: Crossing from country to country In "The Lighter Side" [375108/32025/30] Posted by grahame at 11:23, 14th May 2026 | ![]() |
I guess it's good not having to label and - yes - search engines find up.
The pictures are
Kiel Hbf
Hengelo
Zutphen
Breda
Osnabroek (but not easily recognised)
Antwerp Centraal
Hamburg Hbf
Restaurant in Kiel
| TfW proposed services into Bristol In "Bristol and Bath (WECA, now WEMCA)" [375107/32031/21] Posted by Mark A at 11:21, 14th May 2026 | ![]() |
I can see why GWR would object to TfW making a bid to run services into Bristol but it's a bit naughty that they state they already provide three trains an hour on that axis as that's not the case when I've returned that way from Cardiff or Newport of an evening, when the service is hourly (and, as I've twice, recently, unluckily hit a short-notice cancellation which has turned things into a one and three quarter hour wait followed by a change at Bristol and a half hour wait there too.)
That aside, perhaps TfW's proposal wouldn't sort services during the thinner parts of the day too. I'd also be well in favour of either GWR, or GBR, or TfW, strengthening provision on the Bristol - Hereford - Shrewsbury - Chester axis. When Regional Railways put just a few services into that, in terms of passenger loadings, between Bristol and Hereford in particular, they promptly started to run hot.
Mark
| Re: New Oxford - Bristol direct service, ongoing developments and discussion In "Oxford, Didcot and Reading from the West" [375106/28355/22] Posted by Mark A at 11:06, 14th May 2026 | ![]() |
Is it me or does this conflate two separate issues?
Mark
| Re: Crossing from country to country In "The Lighter Side" [375105/32025/30] Posted by stuving at 11:02, 14th May 2026 | ![]() |
No. 6 is even more up-front about telling you where it’s at: Antwerp. And 2 and 3 are Hengelo and Zutphen. As to the two others … wot no Osnabrück this year?
For Zutphen I was able to search for what’s written on the train – “Witte Wieven”. That turns out to be the individual train’s name, one of seven suggested by the public for that route’s fleet.
Having found the operator’s site explaining that, I switched Google search to show images and was a bit surprised to see one of the hits was that picture of Graham’s! That can only mean that Google had read the words in the image and put them into searchable textual metadata for the image. Not a surprise that that’s possible, but I’d never seen it before.
According to Google they started offering search on text in images (and identified content in images too) last year, However, they only talk about searching your own pictures locally, and I can find no announcement about adding that to web search.














