Recent Public Posts - [guest]
| Re: Thunderstorms: 26/5/26 and counting. In "London to Swindon and Bristol" [375529/32078/10] Posted by bobm at 20:28, 26th May 2026 | ![]() |
Very localised in Swindon. Someone barely a mile away from me had thunder and torrential rain. Nothing here for another hour.
Also looks to triggered four power cuts across the town.
| Re: Bridge hit - again "Freshford" = Limpley Stoke? In "Portsmouth to Cardiff" [375528/32077/20] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 20:27, 26th May 2026 | ![]() |
I think this is the 5th or 6th time the bridge has been hit this year!
Welcome to the Coffee Shop forum, chipbury, and thank you for your first post.
Yes, that poor bridge in our local area must have a claim to being the unluckiest.

CfN.

| Re: Journey Log - and some lessons to learn - Melksham to Harwich In "Introductions and chat" [375527/32073/1] Posted by TonyN at 19:44, 26th May 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
For some strange and inexplicable reason (no, not really
) I found myself with some time to spare at Chippenham station yesterday afternoon.
My connection train was delayed by some 22 minutes, so I strolled over the old footbridge, admired the scaffolding that is now apparently holding it up, and bought a beer in the cafe. Having used the gents, I thought I'd get the lift back over to platform 1, just because it was there (the new lift, not platform 1, which has been there since Brunel). However, I saw that the siting of the ticket barriers in the middle of the disused platform meant that I would have to exit through the barriers beside the cafe, walk around the building to the side entrance, re-enter the station and access the lift from there.
It was a very hot day, I couldn't be bothered with all that faff, so I just strolled back across the old footbridge to catch my delayed train from platform 1. I concur with grahame: the siting of those ticket barriers in the middle of the disused platform was apparently not thought through.
I got told off last week on only my second visit to Chippenham for attempting to access the station via the barriers half way along the disused platform. l had walked from the bus station crossed the road outside the station via the Zebra crossing and followed the path straight ahead which led to the side entrance.
) I found myself with some time to spare at Chippenham station yesterday afternoon.My connection train was delayed by some 22 minutes, so I strolled over the old footbridge, admired the scaffolding that is now apparently holding it up, and bought a beer in the cafe. Having used the gents, I thought I'd get the lift back over to platform 1, just because it was there (the new lift, not platform 1, which has been there since Brunel). However, I saw that the siting of the ticket barriers in the middle of the disused platform meant that I would have to exit through the barriers beside the cafe, walk around the building to the side entrance, re-enter the station and access the lift from there.
It was a very hot day, I couldn't be bothered with all that faff, so I just strolled back across the old footbridge to catch my delayed train from platform 1. I concur with grahame: the siting of those ticket barriers in the middle of the disused platform was apparently not thought through.
| Re: Signs that make me think In "The Lighter Side" [375526/32075/30] Posted by johnneyw at 19:36, 26th May 2026 | ![]() |
My favourite was this one; see https://www.inverness-courier.co.uk/news/inverness-psychopath-road-sign-was-rogue-installation-304917/
This reminded me of the now infamous Welsh road sign which read, in Welsh, to baffled drivers, "The office is now closed, please call back during business hours".
Evidently an email requesting a Welsh language translation of a road sign created an automated out of office reply in Welsh.
This is just one of several documented, some being utterly and bewilderingly unfathomable. I recall one translation which appeared to warn about cyclists with inflated bladders and another specifically prohibiting sports teachers. These were probably the result of confusion with bicycle tyres and passenger coaches.
| Re: Signs that make me think In "The Lighter Side" [375525/32075/30] Posted by johnneyw at 19:03, 26th May 2026 | ![]() |
I always liked "Private Notice, please do not read"
and
"Do not throw stones at this notice"
| Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026 In "Across the West" [375524/31163/26] Posted by a-driver at 18:37, 26th May 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
Still, we haven’t got long to wait and it’ll be nationalised and all the infrastructure faults will magically disappear overnight!
Isn't the infrastructure in public ownership already?
Yes, but many people don’t realise that! Many still think all the failings of the railway are down to the private companies….. and the DfT don’t want to change that thinking!
Previously, any franchised operator had to display its owning company, be it First, Stagecoach etc pretty much from day one. The nationalised operations don’t. I wonder why?!
| Re: Signs that make me think In "The Lighter Side" [375523/32075/30] Posted by CyclingSid at 18:21, 26th May 2026 | ![]() |
I still smile at the notice on the SWR toilet lids, which presumably means they are at least partly successful.
| Re: Driverless vehicles: Consortium wins grant to design self-driving bus In "Buses and other ways to travel" [375522/31857/5] Posted by CyclingSid at 18:16, 26th May 2026 | ![]() |
Self-driving buses still have some way to go https://www.rte.ie/news/newslens/2026/0525/1575160-sweden-bus/
A driver was on board the vehicle to take control if necessary.
| Re: Bridge hit - again "Freshford" = Limpley Stoke? In "Portsmouth to Cardiff" [375521/32077/20] Posted by WelshBluebird at 17:42, 26th May 2026 | ![]() |
The fact GWR arent stopping other westbound services at oldfield park and Keynsham this afternoon is madness. The official advice is to double back via Bath. Which would be great if half of those weren't disrupted too.
Thankfully I dont go to the office much these days but when I did GWR were pretty good at adding stop notices at Keynsham when the normal stopping services had issues. Whats changed?
| Re: Journey Log - and some lessons to learn - Melksham to Harwich In "Introductions and chat" [375520/32073/1] Posted by Mark A at 17:42, 26th May 2026 | ![]() |
**Big snip**
And so to the Premier Inn - we know it was at the back of Lidl, but not at all obvious for pedestrians walking up from the station - very much "road only" design and we missed it, turned around, saw it from various angles before we reached it. Hey - we're here now!
And so to the Premier Inn - we know it was at the back of Lidl, but not at all obvious for pedestrians walking up from the station - very much "road only" design and we missed it, turned around, saw it from various angles before we reached it. Hey - we're here now!
Had to look that up on Google satellite view and that's not trivial - the route via the shared use path from Dovercourt(?) looks to be a bit intimidating, but not as intimidating as the pavement-less A120. And from Parkeston Quay... ummmm...
Mark
| Re: Journey Log - and some lessons to learn - Melksham to Harwich In "Introductions and chat" [375519/32073/1] Posted by Ralph Ayres at 17:38, 26th May 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
Passing through Chippenham occasionally over the years, I've never been able to work out why the island platform was used in both directions when the track layout was simplified, rather than allowing down trains to serve the platform with direct level access to the street rather than all passengers having to use the bridge. Was there really not enough space to allow the track to be aligned alongside the now-disused platform while still keeping a full 125mph line speed for non-stopping trains, or was level access such a low priority in the 1970s that it just didn't seem important? Duffield north of Derby is similar, and in that case there is more than enough wriggle room for a better alignment so that can only have been a lack of thought, perhaps combined with convenience and a small cost saving in only having to maintain lighting, tarmac etc on one surface.
| Re: Bridge hit - again "Freshford" = Limpley Stoke? In "Portsmouth to Cardiff" [375518/32077/20] Posted by Mark A at 17:28, 26th May 2026 | ![]() |
The vegetation was very lush on the bridge approach even a few weeks ago, and has probably not been trimmed. More could be done there to make the structure scream 'Low bridge'.
(Though we'll be well aware from the Ely-tractor debacle that nothing sort of a tazer-equipped drivers seat will help if someone's really not looking...)
Mark
| Thunderstorms: 26/5/26 and counting. In "London to Swindon and Bristol" [375517/32078/10] Posted by Mark A at 17:18, 26th May 2026 | ![]() |
Hope that the railway doesn't end up in the firing line for these: there's a lot of energy in the atmosphere.
Swindon's made the first move as the urban area seems to have cooked up its very own thunderstorm.
Mark
https://www.lightningmaps.org/#m=ses;t=3;s=0;o=0;b=;ts=0;z=11;y=51.5848;x=-1.8794;d=2;dl=2;dc=0;
| Re: Manvers Street, Bath, disrupted for reconstruction works for 6 months from May. In "Buses and other ways to travel" [375516/31887/5] Posted by Mark A at 17:02, 26th May 2026 | ![]() |
Day one. The bus station board still has no information, the display screens at the west end of the concourse switched off. A small thing, but the 700 that's still booked to serve the bus station went past and headed out on its route without calling - and what might have been a First bus + full passenger load to Trowbridge via Bathford, on exiting the bus station, the driver out of habit turned right instead of left and would have had to do a three point turn outside the railway station.
The amount of traffic heading into Dorchester Street surprised me, but then I found a diversion sign in connection with other road works has not been removed and directs traffic into Dorchester Street (now a no through road).
Outside the bus station, an intending passenger talking with the gaggle of bus drivers there and I heard the word 'Melksham' - said drivers had no information, but sent him in the direction of that road - Ambury - that many people couldn't point to on a map - saying 'Ask again there'. I intercepted him and pointed him at the Hilton - which he knew well as he'd actually alighted there earlier but hadn't twigged that the Faresaver buses were turning there - and hadn't absorbed any information on the changes to the services.
Also... the bridge strike at {insert location of usual suspect at Limpley Stoke}. Four coaches at the north end of the Manvers Street blockade bravely set off towards the station and then had to do a group 'U' turn in limited space and among heavy pedestrian traffic. Not ideal. Rumours on the street was that these were contracted to GWR to cover for the closed line to Westbury but I'm not sure they weren't simply tourist buses heading away from Bog Island to their layover location - there being no signage on the right turn from the exit to bog island that Manvers Street is closed - and the first bit of it is open to provide access to that silly car park in front of St Johns Church.
But... it wasn't just the public transport... within an hour, two delivery artics turned up badged 'Marks and Spencer' and one in particular needed most of the forecourt in front of Bath Spa Station, including the pavement, to turn. Fortunately he had an impromptu banksman for this otherwise the station building might have been more at risk of losing another gable + the supporting structure.
All this causing some very poor hangrydriving from a minority of the motoring fraternity so a good day to take additional care on the roads here.
Up at the bottom of Walcot Street - the temporary terminus for Faresaver buses, a bit more calm - though with several buses waiting, not much road space.
The world's notorious for not working the way I expect it to, the people on the ground working the barriers were treating the confusion as god given - or rather, they were saying, with a certain satisfaction in one case "We just implement what the council tells us to put in place" - with the general impression that at during day one there's no mechanism to gather feedback as to what can be improved so *that* can be put in place for day two (and the next six month). But perhaps there is - let's see.
Mark
| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026 In "TransWilts line" [375515/31359/18] Posted by TaplowGreen at 16:51, 26th May 2026 | ![]() |
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury due 20:06
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury due 20:06 will be cancelled.
This is due to a fault on this train.
| Re: Signs that make me think In "The Lighter Side" [375514/32075/30] Posted by rogerpatenall at 16:20, 26th May 2026 | ![]() |
My favourite . . .
| Re: Bridge hit - again "Freshford" = Limpley Stoke? In "Portsmouth to Cardiff" [375513/32077/20] Posted by chipbury at 15:08, 26th May 2026 | ![]() |
I think this is the 5th or 6th time the bridge has been hit this year!
| Re: Signs that make me think In "The Lighter Side" [375512/32075/30] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 15:04, 26th May 2026 | ![]() |
My favourite was this one; see https://www.inverness-courier.co.uk/news/inverness-psychopath-road-sign-was-rogue-installation-304917/
| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026 In "TransWilts line" [375511/31359/18] Posted by bobm at 15:01, 26th May 2026 | ![]() |
14:18 Westbury to Swindon due 15:01
14:18 Westbury to Swindon due 15:01 has been cancelled.
This is due to a road vehicle colliding with a bridge earlier today.
14:18 Westbury to Swindon due 15:01 has been cancelled.
This is due to a road vehicle colliding with a bridge earlier today.
15:14 Swindon to Westbury due 15:58
15:14 Swindon to Westbury due 15:58 will be cancelled.
This is due to a road vehicle colliding with a bridge earlier today.
15:14 Swindon to Westbury due 15:58 will be cancelled.
This is due to a road vehicle colliding with a bridge earlier today.
20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa due 21:46
20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa due 21:46 will be cancelled.
This is due to a fault on this train.
20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa due 21:46 will be cancelled.
This is due to a fault on this train.
| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026 In "TransWilts line" [375510/31359/18] Posted by grahame at 12:45, 26th May 2026 | ![]() |
12:17 Westbury to Swindon due 13:01
13:14 Swindon to Westbury due 13:57
13:14 Swindon to Westbury due 13:57 will be cancelled.
This is due to a road vehicle colliding with a bridge
13:14 Swindon to Westbury due 13:57
13:14 Swindon to Westbury due 13:57 will be cancelled.
This is due to a road vehicle colliding with a bridge
Not a bridge that's anywhere between Westbury and Swindon, mind you

Double track the line again - like wot it was before - and no need to cancel trains! I suggest this cancellation might be to give priority to other services.
| Bridge hit - again "Freshford" = Limpley Stoke? In "Portsmouth to Cardiff" [375509/32077/20] Posted by grahame at 12:39, 26th May 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
Cancellations to services between Bath Spa and Westbury
Due to a road vehicle colliding with a bridge at Freshford all lines are blocked. Disruption is expected until 14:00 26/05.
Train services between Bath Spa and Westbury may be cancelled, delayed or diverted. Freshford, Avoncliff and Bradford-On-Avon will not be served.
Customer Advice
A lorry has hit a low bridge near Freshford. In order for us to run trains safely, the bridge must be inspected. A Bridge Examiner is expected on site at 12:30, but until a full inspection has taken place, we are not able to run trains between Bath Spa and Westbury.
Where possible some train services will divert, meaning not all intermediate stations will be served, but we anticipate a fairly limited service.
Limited road transport will run a shuttle service between Bath Spa and Westbury, calling at larger stations in between as required. These are expected to arrive at Bath and Westbury at about 12:30. Please speak with station staff for information on where to pick up the coach.
Customers can also use their tickets on local buses if they prefer. Details below:
First Bus route D1: Bath (Bus Station), Bradford on Avon, Trowbridge, Westbury, Warminster and First Bus route D2: Bath (Bus Station), Frome (Market Place) are conveying passengers via any reasonable route until further notice. Arrangements have been made for Great Western Railway rail tickets to be accepted for these journeys.
Due to a road vehicle colliding with a bridge at Freshford all lines are blocked. Disruption is expected until 14:00 26/05.
Train services between Bath Spa and Westbury may be cancelled, delayed or diverted. Freshford, Avoncliff and Bradford-On-Avon will not be served.
Customer Advice
A lorry has hit a low bridge near Freshford. In order for us to run trains safely, the bridge must be inspected. A Bridge Examiner is expected on site at 12:30, but until a full inspection has taken place, we are not able to run trains between Bath Spa and Westbury.
Where possible some train services will divert, meaning not all intermediate stations will be served, but we anticipate a fairly limited service.
Limited road transport will run a shuttle service between Bath Spa and Westbury, calling at larger stations in between as required. These are expected to arrive at Bath and Westbury at about 12:30. Please speak with station staff for information on where to pick up the coach.
Customers can also use their tickets on local buses if they prefer. Details below:
First Bus route D1: Bath (Bus Station), Bradford on Avon, Trowbridge, Westbury, Warminster and First Bus route D2: Bath (Bus Station), Frome (Market Place) are conveying passengers via any reasonable route until further notice. Arrangements have been made for Great Western Railway rail tickets to be accepted for these journeys.
Noticing tickets not valid on D1x - is that because of the Manvers Street closure in Bath meaning it's not serving the station there?
| Re: Signs that make me think In "The Lighter Side" [375508/32075/30] Posted by Mark A at 12:23, 26th May 2026 | ![]() |
It'll be long gone, but heading upstream on the Thames, a sign some way upstream of Penton Hook I think it was: 'No fishing between the hours of darkness'.
Mark
| Four killed as school minibus collides with train in Belgium In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [375507/32076/52] Posted by stuving at 12:10, 26th May 2026 | ![]() |
Here's is one of everyone's nightmare accidents - magnified by it being in a small town. From the BBC:
Four killed as school minibus collides with train in Belgium
The minibus was carrying seven children and two adults when it collided with the train
Two schoolchildren and two adults have been killed in a collision between a train and a school minibus in Buggenhout in Belgium.
"My first thoughts are with the victims," said Belgian mobility minister Jean-Luc Crucke who confirmed reports that the barriers on a level crossing had been down when the crash happened.
The bus had been carrying seven children, a driver and a chaperone at the time of the collision.
"The bus was on its way to a special education school. It concerns mainly secondary school children," said federal police spokeswoman An Berger, adding that the crash took place shortly after 08:00 local time (06:00 GMT).
Berger told Belgian TV that the minibus driver had been driving on a street parallel the railway and then turned left onto the level crossing while the barrier was already down.
At that point, a train was heading through Buggenhout and ran into the minibus, she explained.
Images from the scene showed the minibus lying on its side in Buggenhout, a small town near Aalst, to the north-west of the Belgian capital Brussels.
Nobody on the train was hurt although one person was being treated for shock, the police spokeswoman said...
The minibus was carrying seven children and two adults when it collided with the train
Two schoolchildren and two adults have been killed in a collision between a train and a school minibus in Buggenhout in Belgium.
"My first thoughts are with the victims," said Belgian mobility minister Jean-Luc Crucke who confirmed reports that the barriers on a level crossing had been down when the crash happened.
The bus had been carrying seven children, a driver and a chaperone at the time of the collision.
"The bus was on its way to a special education school. It concerns mainly secondary school children," said federal police spokeswoman An Berger, adding that the crash took place shortly after 08:00 local time (06:00 GMT).
Berger told Belgian TV that the minibus driver had been driving on a street parallel the railway and then turned left onto the level crossing while the barrier was already down.
At that point, a train was heading through Buggenhout and ran into the minibus, she explained.
Images from the scene showed the minibus lying on its side in Buggenhout, a small town near Aalst, to the north-west of the Belgian capital Brussels.
Nobody on the train was hurt although one person was being treated for shock, the police spokeswoman said...
| Re: Journey Log - and some lessons to learn - Melksham to Harwich In "Introductions and chat" [375505/32073/1] Posted by grahame at 11:44, 26th May 2026 | ![]() |
... However, I saw that the siting of the ticket barriers in the middle of the disused platform meant that I would have to exit through the barriers beside the cafe, walk around the building to the side entrance, re-enter the station and access the lift from there.
It was a very hot day, I couldn't be bothered with all that faff, so I just strolled back across the old footbridge to catch my delayed train from platform 1. I concur with grahame: the siting of those ticket barriers in the middle of the disused platform was apparently not thought through.
It was a very hot day, I couldn't be bothered with all that faff, so I just strolled back across the old footbridge to catch my delayed train from platform 1. I concur with grahame: the siting of those ticket barriers in the middle of the disused platform was apparently not thought through.
Chippenham seems to be a classic case of the need to preserve, the need to be cheap, and the need to provide security all getting in the way of each other and resulting in a failure to meet the desire to have a passenger friendly setup. The issues are not limited to those identified in this thread.
| Signs that make me think In "The Lighter Side" [375504/32075/30] Posted by grahame at 11:11, 26th May 2026 Already liked by Mark A | ![]() |
Two the last few hours ...

That is REALLY disappointing. We brought all of our dredging equipment with us and were really looking forward to...

Sign read, I will admit, after "business completed". Do I have to fish around to leave only paper ...
What signs make YOU think

| Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2026 In "Across the West" [375503/31163/26] Posted by IndustryInsider at 10:36, 26th May 2026 Already liked by Mark A, Oxonhutch | ![]() |
Seems to apply to the majority of the London - Didcot services today
09:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway due 10:22
09:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway due 10:22 will no longer call at Slough, Maidenhead and Twyford.
This is due to a speed restriction because of high track temperatures.
09:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway due 10:22
09:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway due 10:22 will no longer call at Slough, Maidenhead and Twyford.
This is due to a speed restriction because of high track temperatures.
To avoid using the crossovers at Dolphin Junction and Stockley Bridge. They are pretty much the only trains that use them and they are a higher risk point of failure during a heat wave, and if they stay set to the straight ahead route they can’t fail.
| Weymouth line cancellations In "Heart of Wessex" [375502/32074/19] Posted by John D at 09:56, 26th May 2026 Already liked by GBM, Mark A | ![]() |
Today (Tuesday) the 09:32 from Weymouth is cancelled
Leaves nearly a 4 hour gap between 07:33 and 11:30 trains
Yesterday (bank holiday) cancelled the 15:28 departure
Not very good to leave such massive gaps when it's school holiday week and beach weather.
| Re: France - railways, public transport, services and incidents (merged posts) In "The Wider Picture Overseas" [375501/12646/52] Posted by Chris from Nailsea at 09:35, 26th May 2026 | ![]() |
Thank you for your very constructive comments and question, stuving.
I think I need to look again at this topic, to see how it could be split into a specific topic relating to HGV level crossing incidents, for example.
Please bear with me, while I work on that today.
CfN.

| Re: Swindon <-> Westbury service updates and amendments, ongoing discussion - 2026 In "TransWilts line" [375500/31359/18] Posted by grahame at 09:14, 26th May 2026 | ![]() |
The 06:35 Salisbury to Worcester Foregate Street is running about 13 mins late, Melksham 07:21 -> 07:34.
Looks like it - just - made the connection at Chippenham into the Bristol train - the new one - from Oxford.























